Technology & Management Review follows a Single-Blind Peer Review process. In this review model, reviewers are aware of the identities of the authors, while the identities of the reviewers remain confidential and are not disclosed to the authors.
The Editorial Board of the journal will initially screen all manuscripts submitted for publication to determine whether they fall within the scope of the journal and meet the required academic and scientific standards. Manuscripts that do not satisfy these requirements may be rejected without further review.
Manuscripts that successfully pass the initial editorial screening will be assigned to a maximum of two independent reviewers with expertise in the relevant field. The reviewers are requested to provide an objective and timely evaluation of the manuscript's originality, quality, significance, methodology, presentation, and contribution to the existing body of knowledge.
Every effort will be made to provide an editorial decision within 4–6 weeks of submission. Based on the reviewers’ comments and recommendations, the Editorial Board may decide to:
The names and identities of reviewers will not be disclosed to authors. However, reviewers will be informed of the identities of the authors whose manuscripts they are evaluating. All reviewers are expected to treat submitted manuscripts as confidential documents and must not share, discuss, or use any unpublished information contained therein for personal or professional advantage.
All members of the Editorial Board and reviewers are required to declare any potential conflicts of interest that may influence their judgment during the review process. In cases where a conflict of interest exists, an alternative reviewer or editor may be assigned.
Authors who are dissatisfied with an editorial decision may submit a written appeal to the Editorial Office. Where appropriate, the manuscript may be subjected to an additional independent review or editorial assessment.
The final decision regarding the acceptance or rejection of a manuscript rests with the Editor-in-Chief and the Editorial Board of Technology & Management Review.
The Editorial Board of the journal will initially screen all manuscripts submitted for publication to determine whether they fall within the scope of the journal and meet the required academic and scientific standards. Manuscripts that do not satisfy these requirements may be rejected without further review.
Manuscripts that successfully pass the initial editorial screening will be assigned to a maximum of two independent reviewers with expertise in the relevant field. The reviewers are requested to provide an objective and timely evaluation of the manuscript's originality, quality, significance, methodology, presentation, and contribution to the existing body of knowledge.
Every effort will be made to provide an editorial decision within 4–6 weeks of submission. Based on the reviewers’ comments and recommendations, the Editorial Board may decide to:
- Accept the manuscript for publication;
- Request minor revisions;
- Request major revisions; or
- Reject the manuscript.
The names and identities of reviewers will not be disclosed to authors. However, reviewers will be informed of the identities of the authors whose manuscripts they are evaluating. All reviewers are expected to treat submitted manuscripts as confidential documents and must not share, discuss, or use any unpublished information contained therein for personal or professional advantage.
All members of the Editorial Board and reviewers are required to declare any potential conflicts of interest that may influence their judgment during the review process. In cases where a conflict of interest exists, an alternative reviewer or editor may be assigned.
Authors who are dissatisfied with an editorial decision may submit a written appeal to the Editorial Office. Where appropriate, the manuscript may be subjected to an additional independent review or editorial assessment.
The final decision regarding the acceptance or rejection of a manuscript rests with the Editor-in-Chief and the Editorial Board of Technology & Management Review.
